4 月的美股财报季正降临在一个“不再满足于听故事”的市场。摩根大通 (JPMorgan) 已经以强劲的业绩拉高了门槛，现在的焦点正转向标普 500 指数的“动力室”：处于 AI 基础设施叙事核心的三家巨头。

为什么这一财报窗口对 AI 至关重要

微软、Alphabet 和英伟达不仅是 AI 周期的参与者，它们更是在构建其他企业所依赖的物理与软件架构：包括芯片、云区域、模型及工具。如果这些巨额支出注定要产生回报，那么第一波迹象理应在未来几周的季度业绩中开始显现。

每家公司都代表着一次不同的考验：

• 微软 (Microsoft)： 检验企业级 AI 的采用是否正在转化为实际的营收增长和利润率扩张。
• Alphabet： 检验从芯片、云端到分发渠道的“全栈模式”，究竟是持久的竞争优势，还是仅仅一个代价高昂的防御头寸。
• 英伟达 (NVIDIA)： 检验硬件周期是否依然保持强势、正在加速，还是已经开始进入平稳期。

在 2026 年，问题已不再是“AI 投资是否在发生”——资本承诺已经数额巨大且已完全公开。核心问题在于，这些支出产生回报的速度，是否快到足以证明这些豪赌的规模是合理的。

April’s U4 月的美股财报季正拉开序幕，而当下的市场追求的不仅仅是一个动听的故事。

正如 GO Markets 在最近的《国防股财报观察名单》中所强调的，本轮财报季标志着市场核心关注点发生了更广泛的转变。现在，投资者不再仅仅追求“不计代价的增长”，交易员们更渴望洞察潜藏在数据背后的真实信息。

为什么这三家公司至关重要？

在当前的市场环境下，特斯拉 (Tesla)、NextEra Energy 和埃克森美孚 (Exxon Mobil) 成为了焦点。它们分别代表了 2026 年的三大核心叙事：自动驾驶、电力需求以及原油供应风险。

• 特斯拉 (Tesla)： 市场正在评估其自动驾驶和能源业务是否足以支撑下一阶段的增长。
• NextEra Energy： 为观察电力需求激增以及满足该需求所需的基础设施建设提供了一个窗口。
• 埃克森美孚 (Exxon Mobil)： 在供应风险持续存在的背景下，处于原油与能源安全叙事的中心。

综合来看，这三家公司有助于解释市场关注点的转移趋势：现在的关键不再是谁的叙事最动人，而是谁能展现出真实的需求、更稳健的利润率，以及在日益复杂的宏观背景下依然坚韧的执行力。

在 2026 年，AI 驱动的电力需求正将公用事业、储能和电网容量推向聚光灯下；与此同时，原油供应风险也让**“能源安全”**重新回到了市场的核心对话之中。

‍

The 8 April ceasefire announcement and parallel discussions around a 45-day truce have not resolved the Strait of Hormuz disruption. They have, for now, capped the worst-case scenario, but tanker traffic remains at a fraction of normal levels and Iran's demand for transit fees signals a structural shift, not a temporary one.

What began as a regional conflict has become a global energy shock, and the question for markets is no longer whether Hormuz was disrupted, but how permanently the disruption changes the pricing floor for oil.

Key takeaways

• Around 20 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil and petroleum products normally pass through the Strait of Hormuz between Iran and Oman, equal to about one-fifth of global oil consumption and roughly 30% of global seaborne oil trade.
• This is a flow shock, not an inventory problem. Oil markets depend on continuous throughput, not static storage.
• If the disruption persists beyond a few weeks, Brent could shift from a short-term spike to a broader price shock, with stagflation risk.
• Tanker traffic through the strait fell from around 135 ships per day to fewer than 15 at the peak of disruption, a reduction of approximately 85%, with more than 150 vessels anchored, diverted, or delayed.
• A two-week ceasefire was announced on 8 April, with 45-day truce negotiations under way. Iran has separately signalled a demand for transit fees on vessels using the strait, which, if formalised, would represent a permanent geopolitical floor on energy costs.
• Markets have begun rotating away from growth and technology exposure toward energy and defence names, reflecting a view that elevated oil is becoming a structural cost rather than a temporary risk premium.

The world’s most critical oil chokepoint

The Strait of Hormuz handles roughly 20 million barrels per day of oil and petroleum products, equal to about 20% of global oil consumption and around 30% of global seaborne oil trade. With global oil demand near 104 million bpd and spare capacity limited, the market was already tightly balanced before the latest escalation.

The strait is also a critical corridor for liquefied natural gas. Around 290 million cubic metres of LNG transited the route each day on average in 2024, representing roughly 20% of global LNG trade, with Asian markets the main destination.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) has described Hormuz as the world’s most important oil transit chokepoint, noting that even partial interruptions may trigger outsized price moves. Brent crude has moved above US$100 a barrel, reflecting both physical tightness and a rising geopolitical risk premium.

Tankers idle as flows slow

Shipping and insurance data now point to strain in real time. More than 85 large crude carriers are reported to be stranded in the Persian Gulf, while more than 150 vessels have been anchored, diverted or delayed as operators reassess safety and insurance cover. That would leave an estimated 120 million to 150 million barrels of crude sitting idle at sea.

Those volumes represent only six to seven days of normal Hormuz throughput, or a little more than one day of global oil consumption.

Updated shipping and insurance data now confirm more than 150 vessels have been anchored, diverted, or delayed, up from the 85 initially reported. The 1.3 days of global consumption coverage from idle crude remains the binding constraint: this is a flow shock, not a storage problem, and the ceasefire has not yet translated into meaningfully restored throughput.

A market built on flow, not storage

Oil markets function on continuous movement. Refineries, petrochemical plants and global supply chains are calibrated to steady deliveries along predictable sea lanes. When flows through a chokepoint that carries roughly one-fifth of global oil consumption and around 30% of global seaborne oil trade are interrupted, the system can move from equilibrium to deficit within days.

Spare production capacity, largely concentrated within OPEC, is estimated at only 3 million to 5 million bpd. That falls well short of the volumes at risk if Hormuz flows are severely disrupted.

Oil market analysis

How long do idle tankers last?

135M idle barrels — days of cover against each demand benchmark

vs. Strait of Hormuz daily flow  (20M bbl/day)

6.75 days of Hormuz throughput covered

6.75 days

0

5

10

15

20

25

30 days

vs. Global oil consumption  (104M bbl/day)

1.3 days of world demand covered

1.3 days

0

5

10

15

20

25

30 days

vs. US Strategic Petroleum Reserve release  (1M bbl/day)

135 days of full SPR release pace covered

135 days — but SPR exists to replace this role

0

5

10

15

20

25

30 days

---

135M

idle barrels on tankers (midpoint of 120–150M range)

~33%

of daily Hormuz flow that is idle storage, not transit

<31 hrs

is all idle storage against global daily consumption

Sources: IEA, EIA, industry estimates. Idle crude midpoint of 120–150M bbl range used.

GO Markets

Inflation risks and macro spillovers

The inflationary impact of an oil shock typically arrives in waves. Higher fuel and energy prices may lift headline inflation quickly as petrol, diesel and power costs move higher.

Over time, higher energy costs may pass through freight, food, manufacturing and services. If the disruption persists, the combination of elevated inflation and slower growth could raise the risk of a stagflationary environment and leave central banks facing a difficult trade-off.

No easy offset, a system with little slack

What makes the current episode particularly acute is the lack of slack in the global system.

Global supply and demand near 103 million to 104 million bpd leave little spare cushion when a chokepoint handling nearly 20 million bpd, or about one-fifth of global oil consumption, is compromised. Estimated spare capacity of 3 million to 5 million bpd, mostly within OPEC, would cover only a fraction of the volumes at risk.

Alternative routes, including pipelines that bypass Hormuz and rerouted shipping, can only partly offset lost flows, and usually at higher cost and with longer lead times.

Bottom line

Until transit through the Strait of Hormuz is restored and seen as credibly secure, global oil flows are likely to remain impaired and risk premia elevated. For investors, policymakers and corporate decision-makers, the core question is whether oil can move where it needs to go, every day, without interruption.